The honest baseline at most companies is that the typical meeting produces no written artifact at all. The conversation happens, people walk out with their own mental version, and within 48 hours half of what was said is gone. Nobody decides this. It’s the default that wins when nobody pushes back. The second-most-common state is barely better: an over-long block of notes that nobody reads, or a one-line “we met about X” calendar comment that conveys nothing. The recap exists in form but not in function. This is the workflow you reach for when you don’t have a specialized template, don’t need one, and want a clean recap. It is the lightest workflow in the workflows series — and the most likely to be used when something more specialized would have been better. This guide covers both: how to do advanced meeting recaps well, and how to know when to graduate. This guide is a specific instance of the workflows pattern.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.tryearmark.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Match the recap to the audience
Even an advanced meeting recap is for someone. Be honest about who:| Audience | Use template | Typical length |
|---|---|---|
| Yourself only | Personal notes | 200–400 words |
| One colleague who missed it | Catch-me-up | 300–500 words |
| Slack channel or DM with quick context | Standard recap | 150–350 words |
| Slack reply to “how did it go?” | TL;DR | 5 lines |
| A broader audience that wasn’t in the room | Use the shareable summaries workflow instead | — |
The four templates
TL;DR
For when you want only the bottom line. Often used as a Slack reply to “how did it go?”Standard recap
The workhorse. Use when you don’t know which template you need.Catch-me-up
For someone who missed the meeting and needs to know what happened. Slightly longer because the reader has zero context to start.Personal notes
For your own reference. Written for one reader: future you.Save them as private templates
Start with the Standard recap
For most users, this is the only template they need. Paste the prompt into a new task in the Composer, run on a real meeting, iterate until the output is reliably useful.
Add the others as you need them
Most users end up with two saved templates: Standard recap and one of the others (often Catch-me-up or Personal notes). Don’t save all four if you’ll only use two.
Save with Private visibility
Advanced meeting recaps are usually a personal habit, not a team standard. Private visibility is the right default. See Custom templates.
Run it on a single meeting
The 60-second check
For advanced meeting recaps, the cleanup pass is much shorter than for structured workflows. Three things to verify:
- Is the headline right? If the first line isn’t the most important thing about the meeting, fix it.
- Are there hallucinations? Skim for anything that doesn’t match what actually happened. Cut.
- Vague qualifiers? “The team was excited” — either back it up with a specific or cut it.
When to graduate to a specialized workflow
This is the most important section of the page. An advanced meeting recap is the right tool for many things and the wrong tool for many others. Signs you should graduate — any of these means you’re using the wrong tool:- You’re running the same advanced meeting recap on the same recurring meeting every week. That’s a structured-notes workflow waiting to happen. Set up the template once; let it do the work going forward.
- The recap needs to flow into a system of record. Advanced meeting recaps don’t have the shape your CRM, ATS, Linear, or research repo wants.
- You’re routinely cleaning up the recap to extract specific things. If every advanced meeting recap on a sales call gets pulled apart by hand for MEDDPICC dimensions, the sales calls workflow saves that work.
- The same audience reads the recap on a cadence. A leadership team reading your recap every Friday wants a leadership digest, not a meeting recap. Use the leadership readouts workflow.
- The content is sensitive. 1:1s, candidate interviews, and comp conversations need the consent and confidentiality discipline of the specialized workflows.
| If the meeting is… | Use this instead |
|---|---|
| A recurring team meeting with continuity needs | Structured meeting notes |
| A customer interview or user research call | Customer research workflow |
| A sales call (discovery, demo, negotiation) | Sales calls workflow |
| A 1:1, performance check-in, or candidate interview | People and team meetings workflow or hiring workflow |
| Something requiring an audience-shaped summary | Shareable summaries workflow |
| Something requiring a leadership-facing artifact | Leadership readouts workflow |
| Something where the action items are what you need | Action items workflow |
| A one-off question against a single past call | Ad-hoc Q&A |
- The meeting is one-off
- The audience is you alone, or one colleague
- You need something quick and the stakes are low
- You’re not yet sure whether the meeting type will recur
- The structured workflow’s overhead isn’t justified by the value
The graduation move
When you notice you’re running the same advanced meeting recap repeatedly on the same meeting type, the move is straightforward:- Read the corresponding specialized workflow guide
- Save the relevant template as a workspace or private template
- Pre-seed it on the next instance of that meeting (often via the calendar series)
- Run the new workflow for two weeks before deciding whether it’s an upgrade
Common pitfalls
- Using advanced meeting recap when a structured workflow is the right tool. The most common mistake. If you’re doing the same manual cleanup repeatedly, graduate.
- Skipping the 60-second check. The check is fast but not optional. The model occasionally hallucinates, smooths over disagreement, or invents a confident headline.
- Over-writing. Advanced meeting recaps suffer more from being too long than too short. Hold the constraints in the template.
- Treating the recap as a durable record. An advanced meeting recap is not a decision log, an action item list in your task system, or a CRM note. If the content needs to survive past next week with structure, route it deliberately or use a specialized workflow.
- Generating recaps for meetings that didn’t need one. Quick syncs, broadcasts, brainstorms — sometimes there’s nothing useful to capture. Generating a recap “because I always do” produces noise.
- Hallucinated action items. The model sometimes assigns todos to whoever spoke most or last when no assignment was made. Read the action-items line carefully.
- Advanced meeting recap as substitute for being present. The point is to free you to be present, not to absent yourself from the meeting. The recap is downstream of attention, not a replacement.
- Hoarding recaps as proof of work. The recap is for retrieval, not for filing. If you’re never going back to a recap, you don’t need to keep it.
Where to go next
- Workflows — the general shape this is the lightest instance of
- Custom templates — for saving the templates above
- Composer — the surface where recap generation actually runs
- Command menu — for finding past recaps with full-text search
- The full specialized workflow set:
- Structured meeting notes — when recurring meetings need continuity
- Action items — when the recap is mostly the todos
- Shareable summaries — when audience-aware sharing is the point
- Customer research — for discovery and user-research calls
- Sales calls — for discovery, demo, and deal calls
- People and team meetings — for 1:1s, skip-levels, candidate interviews, standups
- Hiring — for the systematic version of interview evaluation
- Leadership readouts — for weekly digests, business reviews, board pre-reads, decision memos
- Ad-hoc Q&A — for asking questions of any meeting in your workspace

